candace

Bioengineering Workshop

2015 Workshop is November 23rd and 24th The course is now full. Thank you for your interest. Soil bioengineering is an applied science that uses live plant materials to perform an engineering function such as slope stabilization, soil erosion control, or seepage control. This two day course will focus on soil bioengineering techniques and options involved in restoration and reclamation of damaged ecosystems using a combination of structural materials, vegetative cuttings and other specialized methods. Topics to be covered include: Factors involved in successful restoration Successional reclamation Soil bioengineering techniques Regional differences in climate, soils, hydrology, plant types, and growing seasons Maintenance and monitoring. David Polster is a plant ecologist with over thirty years of experience in vegetation studies and reclamation. He has developed a wide variety of reclamation techniques for the re-establishment of riparian and aquatic habitats. Participants will need to bring work clothes, gloves, work boots, rain gear,and an assortment of tools (shovels, loppers, adzes, etc., to be shared by the group; a list will be sent out beforehand). Eye protection is highly recommended as there will be people walking around with branches and sharpened stakes. Who should attend? Anyone wanting to learn more about restoration options with an emphasis on bioengineering techniques This workshop is part of the Friends of Cowichan Creeks project which is working to monitor, protect, and enhance creeks throughout the Cowichan Region by facilitating the work of streamkeeper groups. This project is generously funded by Environment Canada’s EcoAction Community Funding Program, the Junior League of Greater Vancouver Legacy Fund, the McGill Family Fund and the Brink Family Fund. In addition, a small grant received by Pacific Salmon Foundation allows us to keep the registration fees for this course at a fraction of the actual workshop costs! Pictures from our February 2012 workshop Building a wattle fence to help protect the bank We attracted a young helper to install live stakes Pulling the dirt back to support the fence and keep the cuttings moist Pictures from our February 2011 workshop Before: River bank was getting undercut during high flow During: Willow “fence posts” go in for the wattle fence During: Long willows get placed horizontal to the bank for stability  During: Dirt gets dragged from above to protect the willow cuttings

Bioengineering Workshop Read More »

Streamkeepers Course

With classroom sessions and field work in a local stream, participants learn the skills required to evaluate, measure, and monitor potential fish-bearing streams. Upon completion, participants will be ready to join a local streamkeepers group or to care for a creek on their property. The course will cover modules 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, & 11 of the streamkeepers handbook. More information about the streamkeepers modules can be found at www.pskf.ca. Most of the cost is covered by grants though participants are asked to help cover expenses with a donation of $60 for members and $90 for non-members which is to be paid at the time of registration. They can also purchase the streamkeepers manual at the workshop for a discount price of $20. Lunch and refreshments are provided. **The next course is May 24 and 25, 2014**    Check out pictures from our February 2011 course Collecting invertebrates to determine water quality Catching and separating them from the water Checking out what was found!

Streamkeepers Course Read More »

Mapping

Migratory Waterfowl Stewardship Project Main Page About Waterfowl and Wetlands Waterfowl Stewardship Action Plan Mapping Resources Mapping Along with the CLT’s Community Mapping Project, we are currently working to map important wetland and waterfowl areas in the Valley.  Maps of some areas are below. Click on them to download PDF versions. There are also several relevant atlases available online. Some good ones to check out are the BC Wetlands, Bird Studies Canada, the Comox Valley Watershed Atlas and the Sensitive Habitat Inventory and Mapping (SHIM).     Project Sponsors   Environmental Damages Fund Thanks to all those who lent their photos to this site.   Resources Click Here to download a brochure about the Cowichan Valley Regional Waterfowl Stewardship Action Plan View the Migratory Waterfowl Report 2008 here

Mapping Read More »

Waterfowl Stewardship Action Plan – March 2010

Migratory Waterfowl Stewardship Project Main Page About Waterfowl and Wetlands Waterfowl Stewardship Action Plan Mapping Resources Waterfowl Stewardship Action PlanPrepared for The Cowichan ValleyBy S. Willmott The Cowichan Land TrustMarch 2010Acknowledgements Completion of the waterfowl action plan would not have been possible without the involvement of the following people: Dan Buffett – Ducks Unlimited Canada Biologist Art Martell – Former Director of Canadian Wildlife Society, Comox Valley Naturalists Dave Aldcroft – IBA Caretaker, Cowichan Bay Paul Fletcher – Duncan Councillor, Somenos Marsh Wildlife Society Eric Marshall – Cowichan Valley Naturalists Society Trystan Willmott – Madrone Environmental Services Ltd Jodie Krakowski – Cowichan Community Land Trust Amber Hiscock – Cowichan Community Land Trust Funding provided by Environmental Damages Fund, Environment Canada.iiTable of ContentsTable of Contents……………………………………………………………………………………. iii Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………………………… iv 1.0 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………..1 2.0 Waterfowl in the Cowichan Valley………………………………………………………….4 2.1 Key Issues, Prescribed Actions and Stakeholders ………………………………..4 2.1.1 Loss of Habitat – Wetlands and Agricultural Land …………………………..4 2.1.2 Resident (Non-migratory) Canada Geese………………………………………5 2.1.3 Migratory Waterfowl and Agricultural Land …………………………………….6 2.1.4 Future Funding ………………………………………………………………………….7 2.2 Additional Identified Issues for Potential Future Action ………………………….7 2.2.1 Lack of Recognized Documentation of Known Significant Habitat……..7 2.2.2 Decreasing Numbers of Cavity Nesters …………………………………………8 2.2.3 Resident Mute Swans …………………………………………………………………8 3.0 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………………………9 Appendix 1 Christmas Bird Count Data ……………………………………………………..10 References ……………………………………………………………………………………………15iiiExecutive SummaryThe Cowichan Land Trust facilitated a meeting of local stakeholders and regional waterfowl experts as part of the Migratory Waterfowl Stewardship Project. As a result, we identified three significant regional waterfowl issues, involving unique bird populations and seasonal timing, which lead to negative impacts around the Cowichan Valley: 1) Loss of foraging habitat; 2) Impacts of migratory waterfowl on agricultural land; and 3) A considerable increase in the number of resident (non-migratory) Canada Geese, resulting in the contamination of water resources and public areas. These are distinct problems that require public education to increase awareness and to highlight specific causes and management needs. The objectives of this initial stewardship action plan are: to clearly identify the concerns regarding waterfowl in the region; prescribe actions which have proven effective in other regions; and engage local stakeholders to form an advisory committee that will oversee implementation of the plan. In order for this stewardship action plan to be successful, sustained support is needed from local, provincial and federal government, First Nations, the agricultural community, regional experts, naturalists and local residents. The Cowichan Land Trust can play a focal role in administration, coordination, establishing the advisory committee, developing community linkages, and facilitation of a local waterfowl advisory committee, once created. Sustained financial support is needed to effectively implement the stewardship action plan and monitor its effectiveness.iv1.0 IntroductionThe Cowichan Valley falls within the Pacific Flyway and provides important foraging and breeding habitat for waterfowl during migration. There are two local designated Important Bird Areas (IBA): Somenos Lake and the Cowichan Estuary (Figure 1), which have international significance for their high value as waterfowl habitat (Bird Studies Canada, 2010). A Ducks Unlimited assessment of estuarine habitats in British Columbia ranked the Cowichan and Chemainus estuaries in the top class (Ryder et al. 2007). Many other highly valued and unprotected waterfowl habitat areas occur in the region. Extensive data on bird populations in the region, including impacts and changes over time have been collected and documented for the Cowichan Valley. Local naturalists have been conducting Christmas Bird Counts in the region since 1970 (Appendix 1). Migratory waterfowl were monitored this past winter (2009/2010) through weekly surveys by a committed group of volunteers, whose continuous monitoring has provided data to document trends and seasonal patterns (Figure 2). This local knowledge of bird populations, temporal changes and habitat provides an excellent foundation for developing a regional stewardship action plan. The Cowichan Valley has ongoing regional issues with migratory waterfowl and needs to develop a stewardship action plan to help resolve the issues. Local naturalists, farmers and regional waterfowl experts have identified concerns over loss of habitat, impacts on agricultural land and health risks from resident Canada goose populations. It is critical that local stakeholders are included in the development, implementation, and monitoring of the stewardship action plan. In order to be successful, those groups with a vested interest must be active in addressing, and ultimately solving, the problems.1232.0 Waterfowl in the Cowichan ValleyRegional waterfowl issues were identified at a community meeting involving several of the important stakeholders in the Cowichan Valley. Representatives included: Cowichan Land Trust, Madrone Environmental Services, Ducks Unlimited Canada, the former Director of the Canadian Wildlife Service and expert consultant on bird and waterfowl management and habitat issues, Duncan City Council, Somenos Marsh Wildlife Society, Cowichan Valley Naturalists Society, IBA Caretaker for Cowichan Bay, and Comox Valley Naturalists. The Cowichan Agriculture Society (CAS) was unable to attend the initial meeting; however, the CAS have been involved in discussions and developing the content of the stewardship action plan.2.1 Key Issues, Prescribed Actions and StakeholdersEach of the identified regional issues in the Cowichan Valley can be associated with a list of concerns, prescribed actions and identified stakeholders:2.1.1 Loss of Habitat – Wetlands and Agricultural Landa. Concerns ƒ Loss of existing wetlands and changing agricultural practices reduces waterfowl habitat. More intensive agriculture consisting of berry production, nurseries or an increase in farm buildings, such as greenhouses displaces areas used for growing vegetables, grains and grass, reducing food availability for waterfowl. ƒ Loss of habitat will concentrate existing populations of waterfowl in remaining habitat. ƒ Habitat loss is occurring throughout Vancouver Island and the Lower Mainland / Fraser Valley. b. Prescribed Actions ƒ Secure or preserve the condition of existing wetlands through acquisition, conservation covenants, and land owner agreements or stewardship pledges. ƒ Provide financial incentives and technical support to maintain traditional agricultural practices. Financial support could include cost sharing for cover crops and relay crops, or covering costs associated with implementing farm practices in Environmental Farm Plans. ƒ Develop effective local bylaws to protect wetlands.4c.Identified Stakeholders ƒ Ministry of Agriculture and Lands ƒ Local planners and engineers ƒ Local residents and naturalists ƒ

Waterfowl Stewardship Action Plan – March 2010 Read More »

About Waterfowl and Wetlands

Migratory Waterfowl Stewardship Project Main Page About Waterfowl and Wetlands Waterfowl Stewardship Action Plan Mapping Resources About Waterfowl and Wetlands Wetlands are unique areas where the aquatic or marine environment meets with the terrestrial world, and this creates a high level of biodiversity. shallow open water Shallow open water includes areas such as intertidal zones, estuaries and lakes that are covered in water year-round. Local Examples: Cowichan Bay, Mill Bay, Cherry Point. marsh Marshes usually have standing or slow moving water, and dense vegetation including reeds and cattails.  They are the most productive and nutrient-rich of all wetland types and provide habitat for many waterfowl species. Local examples:  Somenos Marsh bog Bogs are peat-covered wetlands.  The water table is usually high and nutrient levels low.  The main vegetation is heath shrubs and sphagnum moss. fen Fens are similar to bogs but some drainage occurs, which provides more nutrients.  The vegetation includes sedges, shrubs and sometimes trees. swamp Swamps are wetlands where standing or gently moving water occurs seasonally or persists for long periods.  Vegetation may include dense forests.  Swamps are often threatened by drainage for agricultural purposes or other developments. agricultural lands Farmlands are important not only to humans as a source of food and income, but provide large areas of productive habitat for many wildlife species.  Keeping a high level of biodiversity can improve nutrient cycling, reduce invasive species or pest outbreaks, and generally increase the stability of the ecosystem. Migratory Birds Many bird species spend different parts of the year in different areas, due to the climate and food availability.  These areas are often in separate countries.  The Yukon Waterfowl Technical Committee (1996) emphasized that “migratory birds belong to no state, province, territory or nation, but are a shared resource for which responsibilities for conservation and management must also be shared.” The Pacific Flyway is a common migratory route which extends from Northern Canada southward all the way to Central America along the west coast.  Southeastern Vancouver Island is mainly an overwintering site for migratory waterfowl, although some areas provide nesting or breeding spots for certain species.  Resident species include swans, mallard ducks, canada geese, and teal. The process of migration is extremely demanding.  In order to prepare for it, birds engage in “hyperphagia” or overeating in their breeding territories. This storage of fat provides energy for the flight.  The amount of energy stored can determine the success of migration.  Therefore, the main reason for the choice in a stopover or overwintering area is usually the availability of food. Regional wetlands and farmlands provide nutrients and resting spots for waterfowl along this journey.  They also provide habitat for overwintering or resident birds. Common species in the Cowichan Valley include: Dabbling Ducks (L to R): top- northern shovelers (male & female), American wigeon (male & female), bottom- northern pintails, green-winged teal, mallards           Diving Ducks (L to R):  top- common mergansers (male & female), bufflehead (male & female), middle- surf scoters (male & female), scaup (male & female), bottom- white-winged scoters (male & female), common goldeneye (male & female)           grebes, American coot, gulls, herons, loons, cormorants The Need for Conservation development and population increases As the Cowichan Valley grows in population, demands for living space also increase. With more and more development near wetlands, coastlines and riparian areas, waterfowl habitat is becoming threatened. land use changes Agricultural lands are one of the most important types of waterfowl habitat.  As farms are converted into other uses, this habitat is lost.  Conserving farmland is important to both humans and waterfowl. Birds can also cause extensive damage to crops, which creates difficulties in trying to have farms as both productive areas and waterfowl habitat. pollution Fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, and other wastes are all sources of pollution in streams, rivers, lakes and oceans.  Eutrophication (nutrient overload) has occurred in some areas such as Quamichan Lake. invasive species When exotic species are introduced into an area, they can out compete local species that wildlife depends on for food and shelter.  Wetlands in particular are threatened by invasive plants such as purple loosestrife and yellow-flag iris. changing waterfowl populations As some species (such as trumpeter swans and canada geese) increase in population size, they can cause extensive damage to crops.  Farmers need to be compensated for this damage or helped to find ways to have both a productive farm and wildlife habitat. Project Sponsors Environmental Damages Fund Thanks to all those who lent their photos to this site. Resources Click Here to download a brochure about the Cowichan Valley Regional Waterfowl Stewardship Action Plan View the Migratory Waterfowl Report 2008 here

About Waterfowl and Wetlands Read More »

Stewardship Progression Evaluation Report

Stewardship Support Project Main Page Stewardship Progression Evaluation This report is the result of a research project funded by Habitat Conservation Trust Fund, the Cowichan Valley Regional District and the Kaatza Foundation. During this project CCLT land stewards from 11 years of landowner contact programs were surveyed to assess the effectiveness of stewardship education. Land stewards were interviewed to determine what changes in land use practices and other environmentally relevant behaviours occurred and/or resulted from the landholder’s experience with these stewardship initiatives. It is hoped that this study will be helpful to other conservation organizations engaged in similar stewardship activities and will help to identify areas of landowner contact that require more continuity and long-term, consistent support.

Stewardship Progression Evaluation Report Read More »

,

Stewardship Progression Evaluation Report

Stewardship Support Project Main Page Stewardship Progression Evaluation Evaluation Report Stewardship Progression ProjectCowichan Community Land Trust SocietyFOLLOW-UP EVALUATION OF 11 YEARS OF LANDHOLDER CONTACT IN THE COWICHAN REGIONBy Ann Archibald, François Cormier, and John ScullStewardship Progression ProjectPage 2Cowichan Community Land Trust SocietyMay 1, 2005Stewardship Progression ProjectPage 3TABLE OF CONTENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9 Background: Landholder contact in the Cowichan region…………………………………………………. 9 Evaluating landholder contact programs ………………………………………………………………………… 12 METHOD…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 13 Telephone Survey…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 13 Participants……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 13 Site visits………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 13 Land………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 13 RESULTS…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 15 Recall of Landowner Contact …………………………………………………………………………………………. 15 Stewardship activities …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 17 Wildlife habitat………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 Number taking action …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 18 Water quality and conservation………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 Energy conservation ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 20 Solid waste management ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 20 Memberships in conservation organizations ……………………………………………………………………. 21 Effects of the landholder contact program ………………………………………………………………………. 21 Conservation campaigns ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 23 Plans for the future …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 23 Other activities ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 24 CVRD gorse identification hotline………………………………………………………………………………… 24 One-tonne challenge …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 24 Charitable giving ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 24 Evaluation of CCLT and the landholder contact program……………………………………………….. 25 Activities in support of land stewardship……………………………………………………………………….. 25 Global evaluation of the landholder contact programs …………………………………………………….. 26 DISCUSSION ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28 Changing land ethics………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28 Landholder contact programs ………………………………………………………………………………………… 28 Limitations to the survey ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 28 Site Visits……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 29 RECOMMENDATIONS ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 30 For CCLT and other organizations doing landholder contact programs ………………………….. 30 For funding and policy bodies concerned with environmental stewardship ……………………… 30 REFERENCES …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 31Cowichan Community Land Trust SocietyMay 1, 2005Stewardship Progression ProjectPage 4APPENDICES ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 33 Appendix 1. Appendix 2. Appendix 3. Appendix 4. Stewardship Pledge ……………………………………………………………………………………. 35 Letters to land stewards……………………………………………………………………………… 37 Telephone Interview Protocol …………………………………………………………………….. 39 Verbatim responses to open questions…………………………………………………………. 43Cowichan Community Land Trust SocietyMay 1, 2005Stewardship Progression ProjectPage 5ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Cowichan Community Land Trust Society gratefully acknowledges the contributions of its primary funders who include the following: Habitat Conservation Trust Fund Cowichan Valley Regional District Kaatza Foundation In addition to these funders, we would like to acknowledge the many stewards who provided information and insight throughout this project as well as project staff: Francois Cormier and Ann Archibald. And finally, a special thank you to John Scull who volunteered countless hours to this project, from its inception to its successful conclusion.Cowichan Community Land Trust SocietyMay 1, 2005Stewardship Progression ProjectPage 6Cowichan Community Land Trust SocietyMay 1, 2005Stewardship Progression ProjectPage 7EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Landholder contact programs have been favoured by many organizations as a tool for encouraging land stewardship. The Cowichan region has experienced various landholder contact programs over a period of 11 years. This long history provided a unique opportunity for an assessment of the long-term consequences of landholder contact programs. In the spring of 2005 a telephone survey was conducted with 89 participants from previous landholder contact programs. Following the interviews, site visits were made to 8 properties. In general, the results of the survey were extremely positive with respect to changing the attitudes, knowledge, and activities of landholders, both with respect to the specific focus of the landholder contact and with respect to wider environmental issues. Landholders were motivated to care for the natural environment and eager for information about how to do it. They appreciated the knowledge gained through the landholder contact program. They responded with a wide range of changes in land use practices and other environmentally-relevant behaviours. Specifically; • • • • • changes in attitudes about land stewardship, including a greater understanding of the importance of passive conservation (leaving things alone). increased knowledge and understanding of land stewardship issues. a wide range of changes in environmental management practices, especially those related to wildlife habitat. changes in a number of different areas of environmental stewardship, with the average landholder reporting 8 different changes. Land stewards were much more likely than the general population to join environmental and conservation organizations or contribute to land acquisition campaigns.The major weakness identified for all the programs resulted from the short-term nature of project funding from grants. Staff changes and a lack of consistent follow-up were seen as major weaknesses in the landholder contact programs. A more consistent dialogue with the sponsoring organization and with other land stewards might enhance the effectiveness of landholder contact. Landholder contact was shown to be very effective compared to some other approaches to environmental protection. To maximize effectiveness, landholder contact programs should be planned and funded on an ongoing basis or, at least, for several years at a time.Cowichan Community Land Trust SocietyMay 1, 2005Stewardship Progression ProjectPage 8Cowichan Community Land Trust SocietyMay 1, 2005Stewardship Progression ProjectPage 9INTRODUCTION An important piece of the environmental puzzle is the stewardship of private land for wildlife habitat protection and the amelioration of negative downstream environmental consequences. The traditional method for encouraging stewardship has been the use of government regulation and penalties. Municipal land use bylaws, provincial water and fisheries laws, and federal wildlife and fisheries laws have been used to prevent or punish inappropriate land use practices. To be effective, these strategies require a substantial commitment to enforcement and they seldom encourage positive stewardship actions such as restoration. They often tend to be reactive rather than preventative. A second approach to land stewardship has been for government or land trusts to purchase land and take responsibility for stewardship. This option is expensive at the outset and involves a perpetual commitment to good stewardship. More recently, there has been increasing use of conservation covenants (or easements) to enforce land stewardship (Hillyer & Atkins, 2005). Both governments and private land trusts have used this legal tool to protect environmental values in perpetuity. As with regulation, covenants and easements require the holder to make a substantial commitment to monitoring and enforcement. An advantage of covenants over regulation is they can be designed for the unique features of each piece of land rather than having the “one size fits all” quality of regulation. Covenants are usually less costly than land acquisition and, within the limits imposed by the covenant, the land may continue to have an economic, personal, or social use. A fourth approach to land stewardship has been through environmental education. Governments and

Stewardship Progression Evaluation Report Read More »

,

Eelgrass Mapping Project – 2004 – 2005

Eelgrass Restoration and Stewardship 2009-2010 Materials for Children Photo Album July 2008 2005-2007 2005-2006 2004 – 2005 2004 – 2005 The Eelgrass Mapping Project 2004 was funded by Eco-Action and was a partnership with SeaChange Marine Conservation Society and the Seagrass Conservation Working Group. The objective was to gather information on the current extent of eelgrass beds in the Cowichan estuary and to train community members in eelgrass mapping protocol. June 2005 The Cowichan Community Land Trust completed mapping the eelgrass meadows in the Cowichan Estuary. They had lots of help from great volunteers, and are always looking to meet new faces. Partners and Community Support for the Eelgrass Project include: Cowichan Valley Naturalists Society (CVNS) Tom Rutherford, Community Advisor, DFO Public Conservation Assistance Fund Rob Russell, Habitat Biologist, DFO Seagrass Conservation Working Group Duncan Divers Dr. Bill Austin, Khoyatan Marine Laboratory Cowichan Bay Kayak and Paddlesports Pacific Water Sports, Cowichan Bay Cowichan Tribes Cowichan River Stewardship Roundtable Peter Law, Ecosystem Biologist, MoE Cowichan Valley Regional District Cowichan Bay Improvement Association Cowichan Estuary Preservation Society Young Naturalists Streamkeepers Environmental Club, Frances Kelsey High School Environmental Club, Shawnigan Lake School Queen Margaret School Streamkeepers Koksilah School Streamkeepers CVRD Electoral Area D (Cowichan Bay) Parks and Recreation Commission

Eelgrass Mapping Project – 2004 – 2005 Read More »

,

Eelgrass Restoration Project – 2005-2006

Eelgrass Restoration and Stewardship 2009-2010 Materials for Children Photo Album July 2008 2005-2007 2005-2006 2004 – 2005 2005 – 2006 May 2006 It has been very busy these last few weeks! Approximately 60 volunteers came out over the April 29th weekend to help plant eelgrass. In fact we were so successful over the two days with many additional hands and help from Shawnigan Lake School, Frances Kelsey High School, Queen Margaret’s and the Sunrise Waldorf School that we exceeded our target of 2500 by transplanting over 3000 eelgrass shoots. This is amazing as each shoot has to be individually tied with a washer weight and then planted by divers!! It is wonderful to see these young students coming out on a very rainy Saturday to help with this project! We held a Streamkeepers course on Speirs Creek in Cowichan Bay and had 15 participants join us for the two days of classroom and field study. The last Streamkeepers course held on Treffery Creek resulted in the Young Naturalists Streamkeepers, aged between 12 and 19, regularly monitoring Treffery Creek for water quality, quantity and fish presence. If you would like more information on the Young Naturalists Streamkeepers please give me a call at the office, 746-0227, or contact John Scull or Linda Hill at 746-6141. We will be undertaking another eelgrass transplant early this summer and another Streamkeeper Course in early fall. Dates will be posted as soon as they are confirmed. Thanks to everyone for all your support! And if you couldn’t make it this time we hope to see you next time… April 2006 Good news! Our Eelgrass transplants from last year are surviving and multiplying! We were out in March checking on their progress and have found that 2 sites have increased by 70-80% which is a great success. The other 2 sites weren’t found but in September they were being used as forage by the swans. I think we planted a buffet for them in that area! Now we have confirmed that eelgrass will thrive in the selected sites we are starting up another round of eelgrass restoration. We are looking at the last weekend in April – the 29th and 30th for the transplant dates – divers will be harvesting shoots on Friday in preparation for the Saturday land volunteers. We will need many hands on land to tie the shoots with their weights and 2-3 buddy pairs of divers for harvesting and planting on both days. To help us organize this larger transplant I hope to meet with our volunteers from last year to get some suggestions as to how to make this transplant more efficient. As well, I would like to invite anyone who wasn’t available last year but is interested in helping out with this transplant to join us in the planning stage. The planning meeting is set for Wednesday, April 19th at 7pm. Please RSVP so I know whether we can meet at the CCLT office or if a larger space is needed. Thanks to all for your continued support – we couldn’t do it without you. August 2005 The Eelgrass Restoration Project has been busy through the summer. There is quite a bit of area in the Cowichan Bay void of eelgrass. The historical record gathered from long term residents and users of the Bay tell us that most of the bay was rich with eelgrass. One site in particular, off Kneipson Rd was referred to as “the garden”. This location was once a popular site for crabbing, now barren of all eelgrass, and home to crabs that do not taste as good. Restoring eelgrass is not quite as simple as one may think. The CCLT had to call in a team of eelgrass experts, Cynthia Durance from Precision Identification, and Nikki Wright from SeaChange. With their help, the CCLT, and many great volunteers attended two workshops on July 23 and July 31, receiving training in eelgrass site assessment and transplant methodology. The days were hands-on as volunteers harvested, prepared, and transplanted 400 eelgrass shoots. SCUBA divers gently pulled shoots from the donor bed, located around the boat launch ramp in Cowichan Bay. The shoots were then individually anchored and transported across the bay, to two different barren sites. These transplant sites are located between the terminal and the closest log boom, and the second one between the last log boom and the shore off Kneipson Rd. Two groups of 100 plants were transplanted at each of these two sites, testing the ability to support eelgrass growth again. If all goes well a large transplant will take place in the spring. The CCLT could not have done this without the help and dedication of our volunteers. Thank you all for giving us part of your weekends to help preserve and enhance eelgrass beds in the Cowichan Bay. Stay tuned for a date to revisit the transplants, and a link to the Community Mapping Network illustrating eelgrass in the Cowichan Bay. Partners and Community Support for the Eelgrass Project include: Cowichan Valley Naturalists Society (CVNS) Tom Rutherford, Community Advisor, DFO Public Conservation Assistance Fund Rob Russell, Habitat Biologist, DFO Seagrass Conservation Working Group Duncan Divers Dr. Bill Austin, Khoyatan Marine Laboratory Cowichan Bay Kayak and Paddlesports Pacific Water Sports, Cowichan Bay Cowichan Tribes Cowichan River Stewardship Roundtable Peter Law, Ecosystem Biologist, MoE Cowichan Valley Regional District Cowichan Bay Improvement Association Cowichan Estuary Preservation Society Young Naturalists Streamkeepers Environmental Club, Frances Kelsey High School Environmental Club, Shawnigan Lake School Queen Margaret School Streamkeepers Koksilah School Streamkeepers CVRD Electoral Area D (Cowichan Bay) Parks and Recreation Commission

Eelgrass Restoration Project – 2005-2006 Read More »

,
Scroll to Top